Thursday 23 October 2014

Absentee Mayor: Brookshire Council Votes to Cut Vaughn’s Pay for Missing Meetings

Frustrated with his repeated absences from city council meetings and from city hall, the Brookshire City Council has voted to cut Mayor Joey Vaughn’s salary if he continues to be “unavailable.”

The move came after Vaughn missed a number of council meetings, coming close to an ouster move by council members.

In recent months, there have also been numerous complaints from residents that Vaughn was never at city hall and did not return phone messages.

Several council members noted they also had difficulty reaching the mayor.

Having neither a city manager or city administrator like many other cities, Brookshire’s mayor is largely responsible for the day-to-day administration of the city.

As mayor, Vaughn receives a “stipend” of $15,000 per year, or $1,250 per month. He also receives a $2,000 per year phone allowance and a $5,000 travel and training allowance.

Council members Eric Green, Kim Branch and Jimmy Sanders all said they were concerned about Vaughn’s unavailability and the impact it was having on city operations. Sanders also wondered if, given the city’s tenuous financial condition, allowing the mayor to be paid when he was not performing his duties was fiscally appropriate.

“When duties aren’t fulfilled, do we as a council need to put something in place? Should there be a continuance of pay when the job’s not being done?” Sanders asked.

City Attorney David Olson said the council “has discretion over what they pay anyone.”

Initially, Branch suggested the mayor’s pay be cut $191.67 for each council meeting he misses in a given month. She also recommended the council require the mayor to spend at least 10 hours per week at city hall. For each hour less than 10 per week, Vaughn’s paycheck would be cut by $20.

Not surprisingly, Vaughn objected to the move.

“That’s just absurd,” he said

Vaughn also said he was an elected official and council members were trying to micromanage him.

Green then quizzed Vaughn on his availability.

“How available are you?” Green asked the mayor.

“In regards to what?” was Vaughn’s answer.

Vaughn eventually added he was available “24/7” because “I’ve got a telephone.”

Green pressed the issue.

“What I’m being asked is, ‘where is the mayor?’ People can’t get in contact with you,” Green said. “Your absence from council meetings has just caused more questions. Here’s a moment for you to give an explanation.”

Vaughn remained non-responsive, saying only he had “personal reasons” for missing council meetings.

Although not mentioned during the exchange, Vaughn’s absence from council meetings – as well as his apparent absence from Brookshire – has given rise to comments that he no longer lives in the city. A number city hall insiders said it was their understanding Vaughn had moved to Sealy; however, that could not be confirmed.

Following the exchange, Green said he could not support Branch’s proposal “without really know what’s going on” but also pointed out the 10 hour-per-week requirement only came to two hours per day.

“Mr. Mayor, can you give the citizens two hours a day?” he asked.

“I give the citizens 24 hours a day,” Vaughn replied.

Green again pressed for more information.

“Can you let us know if there are going to be any more absences at council meetings?” he asked Vaughn. “When the mayor is not showing up, it causes a lot of questions.”

“I can’t foresee the future,” Vaughn said, “but I will make every attempt to be there.”

Sanders then suggested Branch amend her proposal to eliminate the 10 hour-per-week requirement, but retain the penalty for missing meetings. Branch agreed, and that change brought Green on board.

On a 3-2 vote, council members voted to dock Vaughn $191.67 for each council meeting missed.

Branch, Green and Sanders voted in favor; Mayor Pro-Tem Marilyn Vaughn and Alderman Lyndon Stamps opposed.

7 Comments

  1. westsidebill says:

    What the heck is wrong with those council members? Who in their right minds would expect a paid leader to actually do the work required of the position? C’mon people, this is Brookshire – where Vaughns, ethics and ethic don’t mix…at all!

  2. CommonSense says:

    The city is in internal and financial turmoil. The bills can barely be paid. The population of the area is stagnant. The school district lost 1% of their students over the past year. I thought we were told if we build it they will come. Well that was wrong. The taxes are going up and services down. I wish I could be paid when I do not show up to my job and responsibilities. The 20,000 dollars he gets a year would buy a lot of fuel for the fire department. More of the typical crappy Criminal Crookshire. Brass being stolen from the water district. People being paid for NOT doing their job. No leadership skills from the Mayor and very little on council. Absence of leadership, obviously, and failure of policies. When will they figure this simple fact out?

  3. maybe says:

    Ask at the Brookshire post office if Vaughn has changed his home mailing address !

  4. Mikel says:

    I believe this article is way off on the $15,000 annual salary figure for the mayor. Several years ago the mayor of Brookshire made :”way” more than any other Waller County mayor and more than the mayor of Fulshear, Sealy, Columbus, Richmond & Rosenberg. Seems to me just the salary portion was around $60,000. It was the local joke at the time. Thats not counting what he was stealing. I believe the $15,000 annual salary is for the council members…Anyway, if the community is so concerned about the mayors attendance then put together a class action lawsuit and sue the city and the mayor for “theft of services”. After the lawsuit is won the suitors could donate the money to some local food banks or maybe even an electrician to replace the bulbs in some of those fancy ass light fixtures around town..

  5. Sarah says:

    All of this doesn’t surprise me. I had heard a few years ago that the mayor gets around 40K. Each time Brookshire is in the news i hear the same thing but nothing is being done. Just keep hearing the bitching. Stamps is going to side with the mayor because they are related. You would think the Fire dept would be in better shape since Stamps is a conflict of intrest being fire chief and on council. I don’t know who else is related. Doesn’t the mayor have a job with the public works or the drainage district? An even bigger conflict. Business is moving west. They won’t reside in the city of brookshire because the infrastructure isn’t anywhere close to where it needs to be. Therefore they will build on the outskirts and the city won’t get a dime. But all everybody does is bitch and the same problems keep getting elected. They don’t seem to care about the comments made here or anywhere else for that matter. Their drawing in the money monthly and laughing all the way to the bank.

  6. highwayman says:

    IAM STUMP ON THIS ONE, IAM WONDERING WHICH IS THE WORST SENARIO A SMART PERSON MISS A MEETING EVERY NOW AND THEN , BUT A FOOL, UNCLE TOM AND KLANSMAN SHOW UP AT EVERY MEETING

Comments are now closed for this article.